← the index
TheAlgorithms/Python ↗
1.7%
of 344 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
1.7% agent · top contributor 16.7%6 contributors
team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

6
agent commits
338
human commits
6
agent contributors
16.7%
largest contributor

Assisted or autonomous

5assisted
1autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Mar26
Apr26
May26
Jul26
Aug26
Sep26

Peak month: 25%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

GitHub CopilotGitHub61.7%

Verify it yourself

Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.

  • e8f29657Improve `scripts/pr_file_map.py` observability and output metadata (#15317GitHub Copilot
  • 62d049a6feat: add numerical laplace transform (#14602)GitHub Copilot
  • 80c39d0fAdd Fast Walsh-Hadamard Transform (FWHT) for bitwise convolutions (#15084)GitHub Copilot

What was excluded

Commits in window365
Merge commits removed−0
CI / dependency bots removed−21
Considered344

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli TheAlgorithms/Python

Scan another repository