← the index
keras-team/keras ↗
2.9%
of 730 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
2.9% agent · top contributor 23.8%12 contributors
org-wide

Adoption is broad. Many contributors are committing agent-authored work, which is what a real organisational rollout looks like.

21
agent commits
709
human commits
12
agent contributors
23.8%
largest contributor

Assisted or autonomous

21assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Feb26
Mar26
Apr26
May26
Jun26
Jul26
Aug26
Sep26

Peak month: 9%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

Gemini CLIGoogle212.9%

Verify it yourself

Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.

  • 37e91d59Fix calibration memory, AWQ staging, and sampling reproducibility (#23514)Gemini CLI
  • 3422977aBatch GPTQ calibration forwards and use Cholesky inverse-Hessian (#23481)Gemini CLI
  • 6944627dAlign AWQ with reference (mean stat, weight-aware scale, clipping) (#23478Gemini CLI

What was excluded

Commits in window742
Merge commits removed−0
CI / dependency bots removed−12
Considered730

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli keras-team/keras

Scan another repository

Try