← the index
pmndrs/zustand
19.7%
of 66 commits were committed by an AI agent — a floor, not an estimate
Too little recent activity to publish. Only 66 commits landed in this window, so the percentage is noisy. Repositories below 100 are excluded from the index for this reason.
19.7% agent · top contributor 76.9%4 contributors
team

A small group is using agents. Adoption has spread beyond one person but is not project-wide.

13
agent commits
53
human commits
4
agent contributors
76.9%
largest contributor

Assisted or autonomous

13assisted
0autonomous

Assisted — a developer’s identity authored the commit and the agent added itself as co-author. The agent ran git commit during a working session, with a person there. Autonomous — a bot identity is the author, no human in the loop. Across the whole index, 93.7% of agent commits are assisted.

Agent share by month

Feb26
Mar26
Apr26
May26
Jun26
Jul26
Aug26

Peak month: 100%. Bars are scaled to that peak, not to 100%.

Which agents

GitHub CopilotGitHub1116.7%
Claude CodeAnthropic23%

Verify it yourself

Sample commits that matched. Every one links to GitHub — check the trailers.

  • 3febf8c6fix(persist): clearStorage() should invalidate concurrent async rehydratioGitHub Copilot
  • f44cecc7fix(devtools): correct V8 stack regex when source path contains spaces (#3GitHub Copilot
  • beca84e6fix: update broken README links from docs/guides/ to docs/learn/guides/ (#GitHub Copilot
  • ea612a50docs: fix broken migrating-to-v5 link in README (#3567)Claude Code
  • 4e9bcf0cfix(devtools): support Firefox/Safari stack format in findCallerName (#346Claude Code

What was excluded

Commits in window67
Merge commits removed0
CI / dependency bots removed1
Considered66

Bots are excluded from the denominator entirely. Counting dependabot as “AI-written code” is the fastest way to produce a meaningless number.

How this was measured

Measured over February–August 2026, cloned directly. Detection is deterministic string matching against signatures agents write about themselves — no heuristics, no style analysis. Merge commits and CI bots are excluded from the denominator. The figure is a floor: squash merges strip trailers, so real usage is higher. Contributor counts are aggregate — no individual is named.

Run it yourself: npx qmmit-cli pmndrs/zustand

Scan another repository